<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <rss version="2.0"> <channel> <title>Bitcoin Today - Bitcoin News Curated and Powered by AI</title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app</link> <description>Get daily updates on Bitcoin's price, market trends, analysis, and breaking news curated and powered by AI - all digestible in minutes. Make BitcoinToday.app your one-stop shop for staying informed in the fast-paced world of Bitcoin.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 10:10:53 GMT</lastBuildDate> <docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs> <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator> <language>en</language>  <copyright>All rights reserved 2024, BitcoinToday.app</copyright> <category>Bitcoin News</category> <item> <title><![CDATA[Bitcoin Holders Beware: Selling Forked Coins from BIP-110 Could Cost You Real BTC]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/bitcoin-holders-beware-selling-forked-coins-from-bip-110-could-cost-you-real-btc</link> <guid>bitcoin-holders-beware-selling-forked-coins-from-bip-110-could-cost-you-real-btc</guid> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 07:01:14 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[Bitcoin holders risk losing real BTC this weekend by trying to sell coins from a fork that may not even be worth anything. Here is how it goes. Bitcoin may split into two chains in the next few days. If it does, everyone who holds bitcoin ends up holding the same balance twice, once on each chain. Then someone offers to buy the *new* coins at an unusually good price. They look like free money, so selling them can seem like an easy win. But take the deal and the buyer can take the seller's bitcoin too. Both chains initially accept identical transactions — so a transaction signed to send the fork coins can also be broadcast on bitcoin. The buyer receives the same amount in actual BTC at the same destination. This is called a **replay attack**. The safest move for anyone who does not know how to separate the two balances is to leave the coins alone. ![How selling a fork coin can cost a holder real bitcoin. (Shaurya Malwa/CoinDesk)](https://www.coindesk.com/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.sanity.io%2Fimages%2Fs3y3vcno%2Fproduction%2F2da89199523334d514ab6e45b1160524bf778557-1600x790.png%3Fauto%3Dformat&w=1920&q=75) A replay does not drain the wallet. Only the coins put up for sale move, and they leave as real bitcoin rather than the fork version, with a transaction fee paid on both chains. Bitcoin developer **Kevin Loaec**, who flagged the risk on X this week, said large holders could be targeted first. Doing nothing will be a safer option, he stated, as coins that never move cannot be replayed because there is no signed transaction to copy. ## How BIP-110 Makes This Possible The reason any of this is happening is a proposal called **BIP-110**, which would keep pictures, text and other non-payment data out of bitcoin transactions for a year. Changing bitcoin's rules requires miners to agree, and they register that agreement by marking the blocks they produce. BIP-110 needs 1,109 marked blocks out of a 2,016-block stretch, or 55%. (A block is the batch of transactions miners add to the ledger roughly every ten minutes.) That route is closed but the proposal has a second one written into it. From block 961,632, expected this weekend, computers running BIP-110 software will reject any block that does not carry the mark, whether miners agreed or not. Almost every block being mined right now does not carry it. So those computers will start rejecting the chain that nearly all of bitcoin's mining power is building. If some miners continue building a BIP-110-compatible branch while the rest keep mining bitcoin as usual, two competing versions of the transaction history could emerge. It stalls if nobody keeps extending the minority branch, it stalls. Such an imbalance makes a split possible rather than certain. **Miner signalling is running near 2.6%** as on Friday, trackers show. That node share does not translate into mining power, however, as with signalling this low, a minority branch could produce blocks very slowly or stop advancing altogether. As such, if one does emerge, every bitcoin holder initially has the same balance on both chains. The second copy may be worth little or nothing, and somebody may still offer to buy it. Separating the two balances is harder at first because the fork provides no automatic replay protection. BIP-110's actual restrictions on transaction data do not switch on until block 965,664, expected around the start of September. Before then, holders would need to deliberately create coins that exist on only one branch before spending safely. Timing depends on how quickly blocks are found, so the mandatory-signalling window could begin a day earlier or later than current estimates.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>bitcoin</category> <category>bip-110</category> <category>replayattack</category> <category>fork</category> <category>security</category> <enclosure url="https://cdn.sanity.io/images/s3y3vcno/production/61a9559ef27c28600826f6691b0424ccfd776182-1500x1000.jpg?auto=format&fit=crop&crop=focalpoint&w=1920&h=1080&q=75" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[XRP at a Crossroads: Senate's Clarity Act Punt Leaves Investors Guessing]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/xrp-at-a-crossroads-senates-clarity-act-punt-leaves-investors-guessing</link> <guid>xrp-at-a-crossroads-senates-clarity-act-punt-leaves-investors-guessing</guid> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 20:01:30 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[The U.S. Senate's failure to pass the Clarity Act has left **XRP** at a critical juncture, with the cryptocurrency feeling the impact more acutely than the broader market. This legislative setback has introduced a fresh wave of **uncertainty** for XRP, which has been seeking regulatory clarity to solidify its position. ## The Clarity Act and Its Implications The Clarity Act was seen as a potential game-changer for the crypto industry, aiming to provide clear regulatory guidelines. For **XRP**, which has been embroiled in legal battles with the SEC, the act represented a beacon of hope. Its failure means the regulatory landscape remains murky, and XRP's path to mainstream adoption is now less certain. ## Market Reaction While the entire crypto market is sensitive to regulatory news, **XRP** has shown a more pronounced negative reaction. This is likely due to its unique position, having faced direct legal challenges. Investors are now weighing the risks of holding XRP without clear regulatory protection, leading to increased **volatility** and selling pressure. ## What's Next for XRP? Despite the setback, XRP's underlying technology and use case remain strong. The **Ripple** network continues to facilitate cross-border transactions efficiently. However, the lack of regulatory clarity could hinder its growth in the short term. Investors are advised to keep a close watch on any future legislative developments and the ongoing SEC lawsuit, as these will be pivotal in determining XRP's trajectory. ## Conclusion In summary, the Senate's punt on the Clarity Act has placed **XRP** at a crossroads. The coming months will be crucial as the market reacts to this legislative uncertainty. While the long-term outlook for XRP remains promising, the immediate future is clouded by regulatory ambiguity.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>xrp</category> <category>clarityact</category> <category>regulation</category> <category>senate</category> <category>ripple</category> <enclosure url="https://cdn.decrypt.co/resize/1024/height/512/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/xrp-decrypt-style-02-gID_7.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Coldcard Fallout On-Chain: 210,000 BTC Exodus from Long-Term Wallets Signals Custody Shift]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/coldcard-fallout-on-chain-210-000-btc-exodus-from-long-term-wallets-signals-custody-shift</link> <guid>coldcard-fallout-on-chain-210-000-btc-exodus-from-long-term-wallets-signals-custody-shift</guid> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 14:01:30 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[The recent Coldcard security breach is now visible on the blockchain, with a significant movement of bitcoin from long-term holder wallets. According to Glassnode data, **roughly 210,000 BTC** have left long-term holder (LTH) wallets in the past week, marking the largest decline since December 2024. This shift is not typical profit-taking but rather a **migration in custody** following the Coldcard incident. Long-term holders are entities that have held coins for over 155 days, often considered the market's "smart money." Their supply has dropped from nearly 15 million BTC to approximately 14.7 million BTC, a notable decrease. Historically, such distribution waves have occurred near market peaks, but this time it's happening with bitcoin trading around $64,000, **50% below its all-time high**. This suggests the movement is not selling but a response to the security breach, where users are moving funds to newly generated wallets or regulated custody services. The Coldcard exploit, caused by weak randomness in firmware, allowed attackers to reconstruct recovery phrases and drain funds, with losses up to $114 million. Coldcard urged affected users to generate new wallets, as updating firmware couldn't secure compromised keys. This on-chain movement doesn't necessarily mean loss of conviction. Instead, it reflects a broader shift in how bitcoin is stored, possibly boosting demand for **regulated custodians** and **spot bitcoin ETFs**. Indeed, U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs saw inflows of approximately $754 million last week, led by BlackRock's IBIT. In summary, the decline in LTH supply is a custody migration, not a sell-off, and the market's resilience post-hack indicates underlying strength.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>coldcard</category> <category>bitcoin</category> <category>long-termholders</category> <category>custody</category> <category>etf</category> <enclosure url="https://cdn.sanity.io/images/s3y3vcno/production/26b8b4fba46a4ec6068433ab9d7d9a65df76fb6c-3200x1800.png?auto=format&fit=crop&crop=focalpoint&w=1920&h=1080&q=75" length="0" type="image/png"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[VanEck's NODE ETF: Why We Bought the Dip in AI and Crypto Miners]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/vanecks-node-etf-why-we-bought-the-dip-in-ai-and-crypto-miners</link> <guid>vanecks-node-etf-why-we-bought-the-dip-in-ai-and-crypto-miners</guid> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 07:01:28 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[## NODE's July 2026 Performance: A Tale of Two Markets In July 2026, the **VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE)** experienced a **-13.5% decline**, as **bitcoin miners and AI-infrastructure equities** faced a sell-off driven by **rising long-end rates** and **AI-financing strains**. Meanwhile, **spot cryptocurrencies** moved in the opposite direction, with **bitcoin up 7.3%** and **ethereum up 18.2%**. This divergence between tokens and equities was stark, highlighting the unique risk profile of crypto-related stocks. ## Why Did NODE Fall? The primary drivers of NODE's decline were **macroeconomic factors** affecting high-beta tech and crypto-exposed equities. **Rising long-term interest rates** pressured valuations, while concerns about **AI infrastructure financing** led to a broader sell-off in that sector. As a result, the fund's holdings in miners like **TeraWulf (WULF)** and **IREN**, as well as AI-focused companies like **Applied Digital (APLD)**, suffered significant losses. ## NODE vs. Bitcoin: A Cumulative Lead Despite the monthly underperformance, NODE has maintained a **cumulative lead over bitcoin exceeding 80 percentage points** since its inception in May 2025. However, it's important to note that NODE does not hold bitcoin or ether directly; it invests in **equities and digital-asset ETPs**, offering a different risk-return profile. A direct comparison to a single crypto asset is not appropriate. ## High Volatility: The Nature of the Beast Crypto mining and AI-infrastructure stocks are known for their **high beta** to both crypto prices and interest rate expectations. In July, NODE exhibited **68.9% annualized volatility** and an **18.3% peak-to-trough drawdown**, with only **9 of 22 trading days** ending positive. This volatility is a key consideration for investors, who must be prepared for significant price swings. ## Our Response: Adding to Conviction Despite the sell-off, we chose to **add to our conviction names** rather than de-risk. This decision was based on our belief that the fundamental drivers of the onchain economy and AI infrastructure remain intact. We view the July decline as a **market correction** rather than a structural change, and we are confident in the long-term growth prospects of our holdings. ## Portfolio Positioning and Key Holdings As of July 31, 2026, NODE's top holdings included **spot bitcoin ETP (10.50%)**, **TeraWulf (6.05%)**, **IREN (4.62%)**, **Figure Technology Solutions (4.11%)**, and **Applied Digital (3.84%)**. We also exited our position in **Sea Ltd (SE)** during the month. These weightings reflect our strategic focus on companies that are poised to benefit from the convergence of crypto and AI. ## Looking Ahead: Staying the Course We remain committed to our investment approach, which emphasizes **long-term value creation** in the onchain economy. While short-term volatility is inevitable, we believe that the companies in our portfolio are well-positioned to capitalize on the growing adoption of digital assets and AI technologies. We will continue to monitor market conditions and adjust our holdings as necessary to maximize returns for our investors.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>vaneck</category> <category>nodeetf</category> <category>bitcoin</category> <category>ethereum</category> <category>aiinfrastructure</category> <enclosure url="https://www.vaneck.com/contentassets/a9e30345d64d44e48757765b13d9aba4/7702_node-meta-image_2026-8_v1.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Block's Q2 Earnings Beat: Is This the Start of a Major Turnaround?]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/blocks-q2-earnings-beat-is-this-the-start-of-a-major-turnaround</link> <guid>blocks-q2-earnings-beat-is-this-the-start-of-a-major-turnaround</guid> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:01:28 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[**Block** (formerly Square) reported second-quarter earnings that surpassed Wall Street expectations, with adjusted earnings of $1.02 per share, up 64% year-over-year, and revenue of $6.618 billion, including bitcoin transactions, up 9% from the previous year. Analysts had predicted earnings of 87 cents per share on revenue of $6.474 billion. Despite the beat, Block stock dipped on Thursday, reflecting mixed investor sentiment. ## Key Financial Metrics Block's gross profit rose 25% to $3.17 billion, slightly above estimates of $3.062 billion. EBITDA increased 31% to $1.169 billion, beating estimates of $1.078 billion. Gross payment volume from merchants grew 10% to $74.73 billion, versus the expected $73.61 billion. ## Turnaround or Growth Story? Block's massive restructuring earlier this year, which included cutting its workforce by over 40%, appears to be paying off. JPMorgan analyst Tien-tsin Huang noted, "It's clear to us that the improved momentum at Block is sustaining and that the company's reorganization earlier this year is achieving its intended effect: improved product velocity, which will drive improved growth at better profitability as the firm orients to being an intelligence company." Evercore ISI analyst Adam Frisch added, "Q2 was another proof point that Block has graduated from a turnaround to a growth story with encouraging visibility that the current trends can continue for the foreseeable future via Square and Cash App growth, new products, market expansion and AI initiatives." For the current quarter, Block forecasts gross profit of $3.13 billion, in line with estimates. The company also raised its FY26 gross profit guidance, signaling confidence in sustained growth. ## Stock Performance and Technicals Square stock dipped 1.5% to near $83 in early trading, despite being up about 30% in 2026. The stock holds an IBD Composite Rating of 92 out of 99 and an Accumulation/Distribution Rating of A+, indicating strong institutional buying. ## Core Businesses and Innovations Block operates a two-sided digital payments ecosystem, with products for merchants and consumers. The Cash App allows individuals to manage money, buy stocks, and cryptocurrency, and recently added a pooled payments feature for group splitting.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>block</category> <category>square</category> <category>earnings</category> <category>fintech</category> <category>growth</category> <enclosure url="https://www.investors.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Stock-Block-cellWlogo-adobe.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[China's EUV Breakthrough: A Game Changer in the Chip War?]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/chinas-euv-breakthrough-a-game-changer-in-the-chip-war</link> <guid>chinas-euv-breakthrough-a-game-changer-in-the-chip-war</guid> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 07:01:31 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[In a significant development, researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences' Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics have made a major stride in EUV lithography, a technology critical for advanced chip manufacturing. Their laser-produced plasma EUV light-source platform achieved a **3.42% conversion efficiency** in March 2025, a key metric that narrows the gap with industry leader ASML. This breakthrough comes amid ongoing export controls that have barred China from purchasing ASML's most advanced EUV tools since 2019. The research, led by former ASML scientist Lin Nan, demonstrates China's determination to achieve self-sufficiency in chipmaking technology. While the lab results are promising, the power output remains at 100-150 watts, far below ASML's commercial benchmark of 600 watts. This gap highlights the challenge of transitioning from prototype to production-ready systems, as higher power enables greater wafer throughput and economic viability. In parallel, Alibaba is making waves in the AI software space. At the World AI Conference in Shanghai, the company previewed its **Qwen3.8-Max-Preview**, a multimodal model with a staggering **2.4 trillion parameters** using a sparse Mixture-of-Experts design. Additionally, T-Head, Alibaba's chip unit, announced it would open-source its SAIL software stack, positioning it as an alternative to Nvidia's CUDA ecosystem. These developments underscore China's multi-pronged strategy to reduce dependence on Western technology, from hardware to software. The EUV progress, while still in early stages, signals a potential shift in the global semiconductor landscape, with implications for supply chains and geopolitical dynamics. As China pushes toward its goal of producing advanced chips on entirely domestic machines by 2028, the world watches closely. The combination of hardware breakthroughs and software innovation could reshape the competitive landscape, challenging the dominance of established players like ASML and Nvidia.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>euv</category> <category>china</category> <category>semiconductors</category> <category>ai</category> <category>asml</category> <enclosure url="https://static.news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/china-says-it-cracked-the-chipmaking-tech-the-west-spent-billions-trying-to-keep-from-it.png" length="0" type="image/png"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[America's Financial Innovation Revolution: Why the US Leads in Crypto and Derivatives]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/americas-financial-innovation-revolution-why-the-us-leads-in-crypto-and-derivatives</link> <guid>americas-financial-innovation-revolution-why-the-us-leads-in-crypto-and-derivatives</guid> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:01:33 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[The global derivatives market has entered a new era, and the United States is at the forefront. For decades, derivatives—financial contracts such as futures, options, and swaps—have been essential tools for managing risk and allocating capital. Today, this market boasts a notional value exceeding **$1.2 quadrillion**, with nearly half under the jurisdiction of the **Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)**, led by Michael Selig since December. In a recent piece for *The Economist*, Selig argues that **innovation, not consensus**, is the driving force behind America's leadership. The US is embracing **crypto assets, prediction markets, and 24-hour trading**, while Europe lags due to restrictive regulations. Selig asserts that America will not import regulatory fashions that hold markets back. ### The US Edge: Innovation Over Regulation The US approach contrasts sharply with Europe's. While Europe focuses on harmonization and caution, the US fosters an environment where new financial products can thrive. This has led to a surge in **crypto derivatives**, allowing investors to hedge and speculate on digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum. Prediction markets, which let traders bet on future events, are also gaining traction, offering unique insights into everything from elections to climate change. **24-hour trading** is another frontier. Traditional markets close, but the crypto market never sleeps. The CFTC is adapting to this reality, ensuring that US markets remain competitive globally. Selig emphasizes that this flexibility is crucial for maintaining America's financial dominance. ### The Role of the CFTC Under Selig's leadership, the CFTC is prioritizing innovation while ensuring market integrity. The agency is working to provide clear regulatory frameworks that protect investors without stifling growth. This balance is essential for attracting talent and capital to US markets. ### A Call for Global Cooperation While the US leads, Selig acknowledges the need for international coordination. However, he insists that cooperation should not come at the cost of innovation. The US will continue to set the pace, and others may follow—but only if they embrace change rather than resist it. In this new era of finance, **innovation is the key to prosperity**. The US is not just participating; it is shaping the future of global markets.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>cryptoderivatives</category> <category>cftc</category> <category>innovation</category> <category>globalfinance</category> <category>usmarkets</category> <enclosure url="https://www.economist.com/content-assets/images/20260808_BID002.jpg" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[Bitcoin Stalls at $64K While Stocks Soar: Why Crypto Isn't Joining the Rally]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/bitcoin-stalls-at-64k-while-stocks-soar-why-crypto-isnt-joining-the-rally</link> <guid>bitcoin-stalls-at-64k-while-stocks-soar-why-crypto-isnt-joining-the-rally</guid> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 07:01:30 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[## Bitcoin Flat as Global Stocks Hit Records **Bitcoin** and other major cryptocurrencies remained **little changed** on Wednesday, even as global equities surged to fresh all-time highs on renewed **AI enthusiasm**. This divergence highlights a growing disconnect between crypto and traditional risk assets. BTC traded just above **$64,000**, up less than 1% on the day and roughly flat over the past week. **Ether** slipped to **$1,864**, down 2% on the week, making it the only major token in the red. **XRP** fell nearly 1% to $1.07, **dogecoin** dropped to just under 7 cents, and **tron** slipped under 1% to 33 cents. **Solana** remained flat near $73.60, while **BNB** added over 1% to $598, leading majors over seven days with a 5% gain. **Hyperliquid's HYPE** was the standout performer, up 3% to nearly $56. Meanwhile, the equity markets told a different story. **MSCI's All Country World Index** rose 0.4% toward another record close, its Asia Pacific benchmark gained 2.2%, and Australian shares hit a new peak. The **S&P 500** and **Dow** both closed at all-time highs on Tuesday. Tech stocks like **SK Hynix** jumped 6.4% and **Nvidia** added over 2% after hours, though **AMD** dropped 9% on a soft sales outlook and **SpaceX** fell 7.5% on higher projected AI spending. ## Macro Tailwinds Fail to Lift Crypto **Brent crude** fell 1.1% to about $78.50 a barrel after reports that Washington, Tehran, and Oman were close to an agreement to reopen the **Strait of Hormuz**. **Treasuries** and **gold** both advanced as traders trimmed bets on further rate hikes. Despite these macro tailwinds—cheaper oil, easing rate expectations, and a risk-on equity bid—crypto has failed to rally for three consecutive sessions. Analysts suggest the drag is **internal market dynamics** rather than macroeconomic factors. Bitcoin sits roughly **49% below** its October peak of $126,000, while the second-largest asset is falling on the week. ## What to Watch: Hormuz Deal Traders are now eyeing a potential **Strait of Hormuz deal** announcement, which could be the cleanest macro catalyst for crypto this week. If the market fails to rally on a confirmed deal after ignoring the prospect of one, it would signal that **buyers are elsewhere**.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>bitcoin</category> <category>cryptocurrency</category> <category>stockmarket</category> <category>macroeconomics</category> <category>marketanalysis</category> <enclosure url="https://cdn.sanity.io/images/s3y3vcno/production/5dff6ed058589d3d749c6423fadd99ca9476909d-5083x3388.jpg?auto=format&fit=crop&crop=focalpoint&w=1920&h=1080&q=75" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[12-Year-Old Bitcoin Wallet Moves $31M Amid Coldcard Hack Panic]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/12-year-old-bitcoin-wallet-moves-31m-amid-coldcard-hack-panic</link> <guid>12-year-old-bitcoin-wallet-moves-31m-amid-coldcard-hack-panic</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 07:01:14 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[A **bitcoin wallet dormant since 2013** has suddenly moved **500 BTC, worth $31.3 million**, sparking speculation of a security-driven migration following the **Coldcard hardware wallet hack**. The transaction, flagged by on-chain tracker Whale Alert, is part of a broader wave of old coins shifting on-chain in the same narrow window. ## A Wake-Up Call for Long-Dormant Holders The wallet labeled 18TExP, inactive for 12.7 years, transferred its entire stash on Monday. When the coins last moved, they were worth roughly $500,000. Now, they're worth over $31 million. While moving coins doesn't inherently reveal intent, the timing is telling. Blockchain sleuth Lookonchain noted on X: "Wallet 18TExP, holding 500 BTC ($31.27M), transferred all 500 BTC to a new wallet 1 hour ago after over 12 years of inactivity. The owner may have moved the funds to a new wallet due to security concerns following the Coldcard hack." ## The Coldcard Hack Fallout Since July 30, attackers have drained thousands of BTC from Coldcard-generated wallets, exploiting a flaw dating back to March 2021. According to Galaxy researchers, total damage has reached approximately **$130 million in BTC**. The hack has dented confidence in self-custody safety, leading some investors to move funds back to exchanges. ## Not an Isolated Incident Data from CryptoQuant reveals a clear spike in old-coin movements. Coins dormant for **10 years or longer** saw roughly 935 BTC move on Aug. 3, the largest single-day total since March 20. Meanwhile, coins dormant for 5-7 years saw a much larger spike, with **6,388 BTC moving on July 31**. While old coins move for various reasons—estate transfers, exchange consolidations, custodial migrations—the clustering of large, long-dormant movements immediately following the Coldcard incident suggests holders are proactively migrating funds for security reasons. As the situation unfolds, the crypto community watches closely to see if this trend continues, potentially signaling a shift in how long-term holders approach self-custody in an era of increasing threats.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>bitcoin</category> <category>coldcard</category> <category>whalealert</category> <category>self-custody</category> <category>on-chainanalysis</category> <enclosure url="https://cdn.sanity.io/images/s3y3vcno/production/8779265b47c9dddde904c03a5d98623bc8b64d37-2379x1154.png?auto=format&fit=crop&crop=focalpoint&w=1920&h=1080&q=75" length="0" type="image/png"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[US Drafts Ban on Chinese Datacenter Components: A New Front in the Tech War]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/us-drafts-ban-on-chinese-datacenter-components-a-new-front-in-the-tech-war</link> <guid>us-drafts-ban-on-chinese-datacenter-components-a-new-front-in-the-tech-war</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 20:01:31 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[The Trump administration is reportedly drafting a ban on US imports of new models of Chinese datacenter components, marking the latest escalation in the ongoing tech rivalry between the world's two largest economies. According to four sources familiar with the matter, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is developing a measure to prohibit imports of Chinese optical transceivers—critical components that enable data to travel at the speed of light within datacenters. The move aims to address national security concerns, as these components could potentially be used for data theft, malware installation, or service disruption if embedded in US infrastructure. This development comes amid growing alarm over China's rapid advancements in AI, chip manufacturing, and robotics, which have rattled markets and prompted the US to scramble for a response. Chinese companies dominate the global optical transceiver market, and US tech giants have committed trillions of dollars to build out domestic AI infrastructure, though these projects are often behind schedule. The ban would likely impact major Chinese suppliers like Zhongji Innolight, which was recently added to the Pentagon's list of alleged military-backed companies. The FCC could still modify or shelve the restriction, but the deliberations signal a more aggressive stance from Washington. This follows the FCC's recent ban on Chinese advanced humanoid robots and considerations to restrict Chinese open-source AI models. US officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, have cited supply chain vulnerabilities and national security risks as justifications. Meanwhile, China has warned that it will take necessary measures to protect its interests, urging the US to heed business communities' calls for cooperation. **Key Highlights:** - **FCC drafts ban** on Chinese optical transceivers for datacenters. - **National security concerns** drive the move, with fears of data theft and malware. - **China's dominance** in transceiver manufacturing poses supply chain risks. - **Escalating tech war** includes previous bans on robots and AI models. - **China warns of retaliation** if the ban is implemented. **Market Sentiment:** The news adds to uncertainty in the tech sector, potentially affecting supply chains and trade relations. The sentiment is **neutral**, as the ban is still in drafting stages and could be modified. **Social Post:** 🚨 **US moves to ban Chinese datacenter components** in the latest tech war escalation. National security vs. global supply chains—what's next? #TechWar #AI #Semiconductors #China #USChina]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>us-china</category> <category>datacenter</category> <category>ai</category> <category>semiconductors</category> <category>nationalsecurity</category> <enclosure url="https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/612dfa703511b341162b81618cf403090baf635f/835_0_3085_2470/master/3085.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&precrop=40:21,offset-x50,offset-y0&overlay-align=bottom%2Cleft&overlay-width=100p&overlay-base64=L2ltZy9zdGF0aWMvb3ZlcmxheXMvdGctZGVmYXVsdC5wbmc&enable=upscale&s=062fb2d800c8ea7542b3f6a746eaf4ca" length="0" type="image/jpg"/> </item> <item> <title><![CDATA[AI Flags 250,000 Cancer Studies as Fake: The Battle of Algorithms in Science]]></title> <link>https://www.bitcointoday.app/article/ai-flags-250-000-cancer-studies-as-fake-the-battle-of-algorithms-in-science</link> <guid>ai-flags-250-000-cancer-studies-as-fake-the-battle-of-algorithms-in-science</guid> <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 14:01:14 GMT</pubDate> <description><![CDATA[A groundbreaking study has revealed a staggering problem in cancer research: an AI model has flagged over 250,000 studies as potentially fake. This discovery is reshaping the scientific community's approach to peer review, turning it into a high-tech arms race. ## The Scale of the Problem Researchers at Queensland University of Technology (QUT), led by biostatistician Adrian Barnett, developed a **BERT-based 'scientific spam filter'** to screen 2.6 million cancer studies published between 1999 and 2024. The AI, trained on 2,202 retracted papers linked to paper mills, identified **261,245 papers (9.87%)** with suspicious writing patterns. The problem is growing: the proportion of flagged papers rose from **1% in the early 2000s to over 16% by 2022**. Certain cancer types are more affected, with gastric cancer at 22%, bone cancer at 21%, and liver cancer at 20%. ## Industrial-Scale Fake Research Paper mills, companies that sell fake or low-quality studies, are producing research on an industrial scale. Barnett warns that the problem is likely larger than detected, as the AI only catches specific templates. More sophisticated fakes could slip through. ## AI vs. AI: The New Peer Review Three scientific journals are already testing this AI screening technology. The system achieved **91% accuracy** in identifying suspicious papers, but the fight is now one AI against another. As fake research becomes more advanced, editors must deploy increasingly sophisticated tools to protect the integrity of science. ## Real-World Impact The stakes are high: fabricated studies can mislead clinical trials, drug development, and patient care. By catching fake research early, this AI could save lives and accelerate genuine medical progress.]]></description> <author>contact@bitcointoday.app (BitcoinToday.app)</author> <category>ai</category> <category>cancerresearch</category> <category>papermills</category> <category>peerreview</category> <category>scientificintegrity</category> <enclosure url="https://static.news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/an-ai-just-flagged-250000-cancer-studies-as-possibly-fake--the-fight-is-now-one-ai-against-another.png" length="0" type="image/png"/> </item> </channel> </rss>