Binance founder **Changpeng Zhao (CZ)** has ignited a fierce debate by suggesting that **Satoshi Nakamoto's estimated 1.1 million bitcoins** (worth ~$68 billion) should be **frozen** to prevent theft by future **quantum computers** that could break Bitcoin's cryptography. The proposal, made on a podcast with Galaxy Digital's Alex Thorn, would give Satoshi 6-12 months to move the coins before community action.

## The Slippery Slope Argument

**Michael Terpin**, CEO of Transform Ventures, called the idea a "slippery slope" that introduces permission into a **permissionless system**. He argued that freezing coins contradicts Bitcoin's core ethos and questioned whether the decentralized community could ever reach consensus, noting that even SegWit took years to implement.

## The Real Issue: Post-Quantum Preparedness

**Jameson Lopp**, Casa co-founder and cypherpunk, dismissed CZ's comments as mere musing, emphasizing the real challenge is **preparing Bitcoin for a post-quantum future**. He authored **BIP-361**, which outlines a phased migration to quantum-resistant cryptography, creating incentives for timely adoption.

## Alternative Solutions

**Matt Hougan**, Bitwise CIO, rejected both freezing and letting coins be stolen. He endorsed **Nic Carter's proposal** to place Satoshi's bitcoin into a **legal trust** until ownership can be proven through historical records, avoiding philosophical pitfalls.

## Market Implications

Hougan noted the market already treats Satoshi's holdings as **effectively frozen**, making any change more risky than beneficial. The debate remains largely theoretical, with researchers still developing practical post-quantum solutions and no consensus on network response.

Industry leaders warn that locking up Satoshi Nakamoto's wallet crosses a dangerous line and goes against the foundational ethos of digital assets.

Yesterday Bitcoin Articles Digested